A message from
PEF Retirees President Steve Muscarella
NYS budget would impose greater costs on you

ACTIVE
AND SUPPORTIVE – PEF retirees Marje DeVoe, Chris Becker, Joan Pflieger and
Rosemary Rossi-Williams join thousands at the March For Main Street rally.
Send your e-mail address to
rmango@pef.org
to get PEF Retirees news alerts.

PEF
Retirees’ statewide officers began new two-year terms January 1.
I, as president, Mary Reid, as first vice president, and Richard Magelaner
as second vice president were re-elected. Marje DeVoe is beginning her first
term as secretary.
We begin our new terms of office with a vision to ensure our members’
pension and health care benefits are secure. We are dedicated to the
continuous improvement of our PEF Retirees chapters and will work to keep
our members educated and involved.
The state’s fiscal health is a major concern. Gov. David Paterson is
projecting a $13.7 billion deficit in state finances in 2009.
PEF has submitted a list of cost-saving steps the state could take to
assuage some of this shortfall.
Unfortunately, the governor’s proposal ignores many of those suggestions
and, instead, would impose many sacrifices on active and retired state
employees.
Both groups would start paying approximately $20 to $30 annually for
Medicare Part B premiums for individual coverage or about $80 annually for
family coverage.
New state retirees would pay more for their state health insurance, and new
state hires would go into a new pension Tier 5.
(See details.)
We must be strong if we are to protect our well deserved benefits. Over the
past years, we have written thousands of letters and made tens of thousands
of phone calls to our legislators to express our concerns. We must continue
this effort.
The PEF Retirees officers thank all of you who have helped us in our battles
to preserve Social Security and Medicare, to fight the pharmaceutical
industry, to expand health care in America, to stand for government that
serves all the people and to promote respect and security for the elderly.
Some groups in this country question why retirees should continue to receive
benefits from their former employers.
Our answer: “We committed a significant portion of our lives to our
employers, with the contractual understanding we would be rewarded with
benefits to provide security in our senior years.”
We cannot take support in Albany or Washington for granted. Our political
clout depends on our strength as a statewide retiree group and that’s
dependent on you and your work within your PEF Retirees chapters.