By LENORE BORIS, RN
All too many PEF nurses are familiar with the problems
that result from short staffing, mandatory overtime as a
daily occurrence and a patient load far exceeding what
the nursing staff can handle.
Market forces continue to push health-care facilities to
reduce staffing levels as a cost-cutting measure. It is
time other forces begin pushing in the opposite
direction. Those forces should include the voice of
nurses in the workplace, pressure from consumers and
mandates from lawmakers.Out-of-state reform efforts
California became the first state to have a
staffing-ratio bill signed into law. The original
legislation called for numeric patient-to-staff ratios.
The final version contains no such provision. Instead, by
Jan 1, 2002 the state's Department of Health Services,
not the nursing profession, is charged with promulgating
regulations for staffing ratios.
New Hampshire addressed the staffing issue by requiring
hospitals to report the number of RNs per bed. This
approach puts public pressure on hospitals that have high
patient-to-nurse ratios. It also provides needed data
showing a correlation between staffing and patient
outcomes.
In-state approaches
PEF nurses are divided about the advisability of
legislated staffing ratios. The PEF Statewide Nurses
legislative subcommittee and the union's Legislative
Department examined in detail the feasibility of adopting
a California-type law in New York state and opted,
instead, for an approach more similar to what New
Hampshire is doing.
PEF is joining the SEIU New York State Council and the
New York State Nurses Association in support of the
Nursing Care Quality Protection Act.
Similar to New Hampshire's approach, this legislation
requires hospitals to disclose staffing levels, based on
acuity, for RNs, LPNs and unlicensed personnel.
Facilities also have to report "nursing care quality
indicators" such as rates of medication errors and
infections, among other measures.
Time to lobby
PEF nurses will lobby for the Quality Protection Act on
PEF Nurse Lobby Day March 14. This is the second year PEF
nurses will visit the offices and meet with the staffs of
state legislators, bringing with them their concerns
about legislation that specifically impacts the nursing
profession and urging support of the Quality Protection
Act.
Not all nurses can join the lobbying effort in person,
but they can make a difference on their own.
Individual nurses can support lobbying efforts by
telephoning or writing to lawmakers urging their support
for the Quality Protection Act.
If enough individual voices of nurses are heard,
legislators can be persuaded that reporting quality
indicators is the right thing to do - for nurses and for
patients.
PEF Statewide
Nurses Committee Legislative Agenda
· Quality Nursing Care (A2623/S3234) requires hospitals
to disclose the number of licensed nurses providing care
and the ratio of RNs to patients.
· Sharps Safety Act
(S4936) requires the use of safer sharps and needles.
· Exempt Clause Repeal
(A1183/S1058) repeals the exemption that allows
unlicensed persons to provide nursing care for OMH/OMRDD.
· Whistleblower
(A3089/S1453) protects health-care workers from
retaliation if they blow the whistle on unsafe
health-care practices.

Legislative
support needed
PEF makes progress on Safe needles campaign
By MARY CAROLINE
POWERS
PEF efforts to involve high-ranking state officials in
the push for an end to needle-stick injuries are
progressing.
Comptroller H. Carl McCall has agreed to meet with
members of the Needlestick Injury Prevention
Task Force.
"I agree this is a serious issue that deserves the
state's attention.... I think my staff could play a
policy role," McCall wrote in a communiqué to PEF
President Roger Benson.
At issue is the alarmingly high rate of needle-stick
injuries - estimated by the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration at 600,000 to 1 million per year
for workers primarily in the health-care field. These
accidents can expose them to HIV and the hepatitis B and
hepatitis C viruses.
Purchasing peculiarity PEF
is hoping McCall can smooth the way for increasing the
number of state contracts with manufacturers of the
safest needle-stick products on the market.
An oddity in the procedure for state-purchasing contracts
stipulates that if a product is unsafe, that must first
be proven before a facility can purchase a different,
safer product.
"That's backwards," says Jonathan Rosen,
director of PEF's Health and Safety Department and a
member of the task force. "We're saying, to get on a
state contract, a product should meet safety requirements
first."
The state Office of Mental Health (OMH) went through an
arduous process to get retractable safety needles on
state contract. As a result, state and other public
facilities can use that contract.
OMH facilities are now purchasing these devices, with
input from rank-and-file nurses. One is the Mohawk Valley
Psychiatric Center (MVPC), where a three-year test using
retractable needles was conducted in an effort to reduce
needle-stick injuries at
the facility.
In a report to OMH's Bureau of Health Services, MVPC's
infection control nurse Carolyn Squillace noted that
since April 1998 more than 5,000 retractable needles have
been dispensed at the facility and no contaminated
needle-stick injuries have been reported. In the years
previous to the test, MVPC had eight such injuries in
1994, three in 1995 and five in 1996.
Other products that recently have undergone design
improvements to reduce the risk of contamination include
improved sharps containers, needleless intravenous
equipment and closed blood-collection systems.
Achievable goals
The multi-union task force, which includes PEF
representatives from the state Department of Correctional
Services, Department of Health, OMH, Civil Service and
SUNY, among others, has multiple goals:
· to get the issue before health-care managers and
workers;
· to convince the state to allow its agencies to
purchase the safest devices available; and
· to pass legislation that will mandate the use of safer
needle devices in the state.
If New York passes the proposed legislation, it will be
only the sixth state in the country to do so. The most
recent was New Jersey where safe-needle legislation was
signed into law January 5. It requires health-care
facilities throughout New Jersey to employ safe-needle
systems within the next 12 months. The law was passed
after an intense lobbying effort by a coalition of
concerned groups including one of PEF's international
affiliates, the Service Employees International Union,
which is aiding PEF in its effort to see similar
legislation passed in New York. Six other states are
considering safe-needle laws.
OSHA's safety
mandate
Adding impetus to the effort is a new blood-borne-disease
compliance directive to inspectors issued by the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration that
requires facilities with health-care operations to show
they are using the safest equipment available. The state
Department of Labor's Bureau of Public Employee Safety
and Health (PESH) will adopt the OSHA directive.
"We're getting good cooperation at the top, but this
needs to be implemented unit-by-unit,
hospital-by-hospital," Rosen says. "And it's
hard to get people to focus on safety issues in the
current atmosphere of short staffing."
Safe needle
legislation for NYS would:
· Require the use by health-care facilities of needles
and sharps devices with integrated safety features as
approved by the Food and Drug Administration;
· Establish a technical advisory committee, including
workers, to oversee implementation of the legislative
mandate;
· Impose civil penalties on employers who violate the
provisions of the law.
The bill in the Senate (S.4936A) is in the Health
Committee. The Assembly bill (A.7144B) is in Rules
Committee.
Call your state legislators today at this toll-free
number (877) 373-7920 and urge their support of the
legislation.
|
|