By MARY CAROLINE POWERS
Once a national leader in the arena of workplace safety
for public employees, the New York State Department of
Labor's Public Employee Safety and Health program is now
in shambles.
The program recently came under the scrutiny of the
national Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), which concluded that staffing levels for PESH are
woefully inadequate: 64.5 percent of the federal
benchmark for safety inspectors and 77.8 percent for
health inspectors. OSHA, which provides 50 percent of the
funding for the New York PESH program, has refused to
certify it because of continuing deficiencies.
Staffing isn't the only problem. The program is plagued
by inadequate training for inspectors. Short staffing is
causing long delays in responding to hazardous workplace
conditions. A lack of management support has undercut
enforcement when infractions are discovered.
"This is reflective of the anti-regulatory stance
taken by the Pataki Administration," said PEF
President Roger Benson. "But worse, it has left our
members, many of whom are working at high-risk jobs,
imperiled."
Inspectors cited a shortage of testing equipment such as
hazardous-atmosphere monitors that should be used to
check confined spaces for oxygen deficiencies or toxic
atmospheres - conditions that have caused numerous worker
fatalities.Study conducted
PEF's nearly 54,000 members working in the public sector
are covered by the requirements of the PESH Act of 1980.
Concerned about the viability of the program that is
supposed to protect its members, the union recently
surveyed PESH inspectors. Comments written by the
inspectors expose the program's disarray.
Action Urged
PEF leaders recommend a variety of actions be undertaken
in order for PESH to meet its legislative mandate of
ensuring that "all public employees are afforded the
same safeguards in their workplaces as are granted to
employees in the private sector."
PEF is calling for the state Legislature to appoint a
special commission to investigate the PESH program, the
state comptroller to audit PESH, restoration of the
principal industrial hygienist position, and development
of a plan to provide training at the OSHA Training
Institute for inspectors.
PEF also is participating with the state AFL-CIO to
gather information from all unions representing public
employees about recent experiences with PESH, and what
needs to be done to get the program properly staffed and
trained.
What the survey
found
Of the 58 inspectors employed by the state program, 42
responded to the PEF survey, for an extremely high
response rate of 72 percent. Here are some of the results
of the survey:
· 90 percent said PESH does not have sufficient staff to
meet its legislative mandate.
· 55 percent said there is insufficient support staff in
their offices, keeping inspectors out of the field and in
the office doing
clerical work.
· 61 percent said excessive delays exist for getting
inspection reports and citations typed and approved.
· 49 percent said PESH is not timely in answering
complaints.
· 74 percent said PESH does not perform enough
inspections to fulfill its mission.
· 27 percent said they or their coworkers were
discouraged from responding to a complaint.
· 29 percent said they had been discouraged from writing
violations.
· 50 percent said there was inadequate management
support for enforcing abatement of violations cited.
· 85 percent said there was insufficient access to
training necessary to do the job.
· 83 percent said training, supervision, management and
time allocation were insufficient to accomplish the
mission of the program.
Inspectors' angst
Many of the PESH inspectors who took part in the PEF
survey added additional comments about problems in their
work situations. Here are some examples of what they had
to say:
"PESH is a skeleton operation, going through the
motions, but not impacting the public sector like it used
to."
"We have one safety inspector covering nine
counties."
"We have no support staff in our office. This has
been the case since October 1998. Citations for
inspections conducted during December 1998 still have not
been issued."
"There has been virtually no training in the past
five years. The whole program is in shambles. It lacks
leadership. We lack equipment, training and
support."
|
|