Wants
Article 17 arbitration
To the Editor:
In response to Larry Woodwards letter
condemning out-of-title work, the sad truth is
there is not much we can do about it under our
contract.
I, too, am working 100 percent in a higher grade
working at grade 23, but getting paid as a
grade 18.
Under PS&T Contract Article 17, when this
happens, a grievance can be filed with
management. But all they have to do is say no.
The appeal is to the Governors Office of
Employee Relations (GOER), and they back up
management kind of like the fox watching
the hen house.
Thats as far as we can go under this
contract. Out-of-title work should be handled
like any serious grievance, because it could
involve a change in compensation. It should be
allowed to go to arbitration and be decided by a
third party.
ALAN HOXIE
Syracuse
Editors Note: PEF can appeal
GOERs decision in state Supreme Court
through an Article 78 proceeding. PEF followed
this process in the Woodward case and won in the
courts.
|
Why
PEFs dual affiliation?
To the
Editor:
After reviewing the PEF financial reports you
have published, I wonder why we are affiliates of
both the American Federation of Teachers (AFT)
and the Service Employees International Union
(SEIU).
When we pay per capita dues to them,
is it for the total membership to both?
Clarification and further elaboration would be
helpful.
EVA NORDHAUSER
Suffern
Editors Note: PEF is
affiliated with both international unions because
AFT and SEIU worked together to form PEF and win
election as the collective-bargaining agent for
the states PS&T bargaining unit in the
late 1970s.
For purposes of dues to the international unions,
PEFS membership is split. PEF pays only
once for each of its members.
---------------
Field rep did admirable job
To the Editor:
I am writing to express my appreciation and
gratitude for the legal and moral support the
union extended to me through Michele Routi,
Region 12 field representative.
Throughout my grievances and arbitration, Michele
always went the extra mile to make sure every
possible avenue was explored. Her dedication was
admirable and I was always informed and involved
in the details of the case. Her knowledge and
dedication were rewarded when my grievance was
settled to my satisfaction.
I highly commend Michele for maintaining her
enthusiasm, professionalism and focus throughout
the very long procedure that lasted from May 20
to December 2001.
As a PEF member, I am proud to be represented by
such a wonderful person.
Niharendu Paul
Long Island
|
Push
state to reduce SS# use
To the Editor:
I was very pleased to read in the November issue
of The Communicator that delegates to the 2001
PEF Convention passed a resolution to try to get
the state to establish a new form of employee
identification, independent of the Social
Security number for use wherever individual
identification is needed, and to remove SS
numbers from existing records, other than those
related to tax and payroll.
Ever since I had learned about the crime of
identity theft, I have been concerned about the
use of Social Security numbers when not
necessary, such as for health insurance
identification numbers.
I hope PEF will work to get this resolution
implemented ASAP, as this will help to decrease
the probability of identity theft.
GAIL E. PETERS
New York City
Editors note: PEF has already
instituted use of a PEF Member ID number to
replace the SS number for use in PEF elections.
|