Governor Pataki, once again, the bill’s in your court.Sign the Contract Disclosure Bill

Battle for accountability legislation heats up again

By SHERRY HALBROOK
The state Legislature has, once again, passed the Contract Disclosure Bill and sent it to the governor for his signature.

“This legislation, which would require state agencies to report how many private consultants and contractors work for them and how much it costs, goes to the very heart of what our Go Public Campaign for greater public accountability is about,” said PEF President Roger Benson.


“Last year, this bill was passed unanimously by both the state Assembly and the Senate, but the governor vetoed it — saying it would be too much trouble to gather and report that information. So, we worked with the legislators to address that concern.”

The legislation also has had vigorous support from the editorial boards of the Albany Times Union, the Schenectady Daily Gazette, and the Rochester Democrat & Chronicle, which called on the Legislature to override a veto.

This bill is necessary because study after study has shown that hundreds of millions of tax dollars are wasted annually through misguided contracting out of routine state services. Taxpayers should have the right to know whether or not that money is being wisely spent, but, since the state does not track or publish this information, they have no way to determine how their tax dollars are spent on contracts for consultant services.

The bill would simply require state agencies to report information their consultants already provide to them.

An article on page 3 of this magazine details how the use of private consultants by two state agencies for information technology projects has wasted millions of tax dollars.

While you can find such examples under almost any rock in state government, it involves some very heavy lifting.

It took PEF more than one year to request, receive, compile and analyze the data necessary to make these comparisons just at the state Department of Taxation and Finance. It took six separate requests for PEF to receive the information it originally requested in November 2004. Even then, the state withheld some key information.

“Taxpayers should not need budget and contract analysis skills and work for more than a year to determine how much the state Department of Taxation and Finance spent on information technology consultants and how many consultants it employed,” Benson said.

The Communicator April 2006

Features

Agencies wastes $ on consultants
Members work to stop bad budget
DOT members meet lawmakers
PEF gets support  in stopping cuts
DOT members tell all at hearing
New program addresses grievances
Battle for accountability heats up

Departments
President's Message
You Said It
Retirees In Action
Membership Benefits &Travel

Union Matters
PEF political endorsements...
Probation officers want fairness
Parole officers caseload is murder
Nurses must mobilize to pass...
Performance award checks coming
Progress: Stop Workplace Violence
Promotion Test Battery update
PS&T Contract Survey
2006 Conv. Delegate Information
State must re-bid Rx contract
New web site shows benefits

Other Links
Professional Directory
Members' Classified

Member Communicator Feedback
Prefer The Online Edition?
How To Advertise Here
The Communicator Staff

Questions on this site?
Email the
Webmaster

Search Communicators for:


Site search
Web search
powered by
FreeFind