
MAKING A POINT — PEF Division 236
Council Leader Manuelita Clemente tells members at a state Senate hearing in
Albany the graduated sanctions policy hinders parole officers ability to do
their jobs effectively. Clemente was joined by parole officers Michael
Murphy, Ismael Cruz Jr and Wayne Spence. — Photos by Sherry Halbrook
PEF
members speak out on risky parole policies
By SHERRY HALBROOK
Passions ran high and wide March 18 at a state Senate hearing in Albany
focused on the “graduated sanctions” policy at the state Division of Parole
(DOP) that has left a number of parole violators on the streets, and a trail
of mayhem in their wake.
The graduated sanctions policy sees a parolee’s compliance with the terms of
his or her parole in shades of gray, rather than black and white. Instead of
immediately returning the parolee to prison for failing certain conditions
of the parole, such as curfews, drug tests, or associating with other
felons, DOP may tighten the restrictions or send the parolee for another
round of drug-abuse treatment.
Members of the Senate Committee on Crime Victims, Crime and Correction came
to the hearing armed with news reports of very violent events. The incidents
involved at least seven parolees who had previously violated the terms of
their paroles and broken laws, but were not sent back to prison.
Among the parolees mentioned was Howard Tucker, 37, who was shot and killed
February 16 by Albany police after he tried to run an officer over. Tucker
reportedly had failed at least seven drug tests during his parole.
Reports also featured James Tyson Jr, 33, who was killed in a 2009 shootout
with police in Syracuse. Reportedly, he, too, had been allowed to remain on
parole after failing drug tests.
Seventy-one percent of parolees have a history of drug abuse and 37 percent
were convicted of drug-related crimes.
Saving lives?
State Parole Board Chair Andrea Evans and her top staff members at the DOP
defended the graduated sanctions program as providing needed flexibility in
helping parolees adjust to life outside prison walls.
Evans introduced a parolee who failed several drug tests before succeeding
in remaining drug free for a year, and who now appears to be law-abiding and
productive.
Or saving money?
PEF members from DOP testified they believe the desire to save money and
favorably skew recidivism and crime statistics are the reason state policies
keep law-breaking, absconding and parole-violating felons on the streets.
“This was all ordered by Denise O’Donnell” when she was state commissioner
of Criminal Justice Services and NYS deputy secretary for public safety,
said PEF Division 236 Council Leader Manuelita (Manny) Clemente, a parole
officer.
Clemente said it’s unfair to hold Evans responsible for policies that were
in place before she became chair of the Parole Board.
Undermining respect
Clemente and fellow officers Michael Murphy, Ismael Cruz Jr and Wayne
Spence, PEF Executive Board members, told the committee the graduated
sanctions policy has made it even more challenging for parole officers to
fulfill their dual obligations to: Help parolees successfully transition
from their highly structured lives in prison to lives as responsible
citizens in the community; And to protect the public safety at all times.
“Parole rarely (charges) anyone anymore for technical violations. And it’s
not going after parolees who abscond,” Clemente said.
The officers said policies portrayed by DOP as flexible are seen by parolees
as lax and toothless, and foster a dangerous contempt for parole and its
officers.
Shortages of drug-testing kits last year and a top-down reluctance at DOP to
prosecute parolees who fail the tests, are just two examples of how parole
officers’ hands are often tied, Clemente said.
Prior to 2008, senior parole officers could independently issue arrest
warrants for parolees who committed technical violations, she said. That
authority now rests with area supervisors.
Nevertheless, when something goes wrong, “it’s the parole officer who gets
scrutinized and punished,” Clemente said.
Dangerous combination
PEF’s parole leaders said officers’ caseloads have become unmanageably high
and DOP disguises the true numbers by counting parolees as fractions of a
case after they have been out of prison for a while.
“When you are supervising 100 parolees, you can’t even remember all their
names or recognize all their faces,” Cruz said.
To be successful, graduated sanctions depends on parole officers giving more
intensive supervision to parolees who push the limits of their paroles,
Murphy said.
“Leaving violators on the street requires closer scrutiny, more staff and
lower caseloads,” Murphy said.
“This should be about holding this (parole) population accountable,” Cruz
said. “The parolees are now being supervised on their terms, not ours.”
Lawmakers frustrated too
Committee Chair Sen. Ruth Hassle-Thompson said, “We want caseload caps in
parole and we are going to get them.”
“We have to find a balance (between flexibility and rigidity) where the
system works,” Sen. Martin Golden said.
Jeffrion Aubry, chair of the Assembly Committee on Correction and a guest at
the hearing, told the PEF members, “The state owes your union and your
members a debt of gratitude for all you do for the people of New York.

RESPONDING — Sen. Ruth Hassell-Thompson with
Committee Council Gerard Savage tells parole officers she agrees
caseloads need a cap.