Targeted ERI makes no sense
To the Editor:
It seems when an early retirement incentive is passed there are always
strings attached. I am not eligible yet, although I am just one month shy of
25 years service with the state Transportation Department. I do, however,
know of several people who are eligible.
Unfortunately, the Executive Branch is short-sighted. The Part A incentive
should be done without targeting specific employees.
Eliminate the jobs you can; but where safety is concerned replace them.
Essential personnel are usually the ones who do the work, but how are they
rewarded? With more work, of course.
It seems elementary: If a motor vehicle inspector retires and is replaced by
either a mechanic from Equipment Management (who is then replaced by someone
from the private sector) or directly by someone from the private sector, you
achieve savings in several areas.
The state is guaranteed a three-week lag of payroll, either at the entry
level of the inspector or the mechanic. This is an instant cash flow savings
for the state. Then, you have someone entering pension Tier 5, which will
save the state in the future. You also have the pay differential of the
retiree and the replacement: more cash. To add to this, you have enabled an
opening in the private sector, possibly for someone who has been unemployed,
another win (cash savings from unemployment).
NICHOLAS COLLINS
Glens Falls
Appreciates news
coverage
To the Editor:
I found your “Legislative Action” article on health care reform (in the May
issue of The Communicator) very helpful.
For one who is retired and living out of New York state, this news magazine
is frequently the only way to remain informed. Thank you for the article.
KATHLEEN McCAHILL
North Ft. Myers, FL
Fans are where you find them
To the Editor:
I’m an activist with the AFT-Wisconsin in Madison. I’m a state employee and
member of local 4848. I always read your magazine when I visit a friend, a
retiree who gets it on the East Coast.
Can I subscribe to keep up with your inspiring activities?
BARBARA SMITH
Madison, WI
Editor’s note: If you would like to receive The Communicator, please e-mail
your request to www.thecommunicator.org.

The Communicator
Letters policy
We welcome letters to the editor about union issues
and events relevant to PEF's diverse membership. All letters are subject to
editing for space, fairness and good taste.
Please keep them brief (up to one page, double-spaced or a maximum of 250
words), and please include your name and phone number for verification.
Send letters to
thecommunicator@pef.org:
The
Communicator
Public Employees Federation
P.O. Box 12414
Albany, N.Y. 12212-2414
Email to Sherry
Halbrook, Editor or Darcy Wells,
Editor-In Chief