Targeted ERI makes no sense

To the Editor:
It seems when an early retirement incentive is passed there are always strings attached. I am not eligible yet, although I am just one month shy of 25 years service with the state Transportation Department. I do, however, know of several people who are eligible.

Unfortunately, the Executive Branch is short-sighted. The Part A incentive should be done without targeting specific employees.

Eliminate the jobs you can; but where safety is concerned replace them.

Essential personnel are usually the ones who do the work, but how are they rewarded? With more work, of course.

It seems elementary: If a motor vehicle inspector retires and is replaced by either a mechanic from Equipment Management (who is then replaced by someone from the private sector) or directly by someone from the private sector, you achieve savings in several areas.

The state is guaranteed a three-week lag of payroll, either at the entry level of the inspector or the mechanic. This is an instant cash flow savings for the state. Then, you have someone entering pension Tier 5, which will save the state in the future. You also have the pay differential of the retiree and the replacement: more cash. To add to this, you have enabled an opening in the private sector, possibly for someone who has been unemployed, another win (cash savings from unemployment).

NICHOLAS COLLINS
Glens Falls


Appreciates news coverage
To the Editor:
I found your “Legislative Action” article on health care reform (in the May issue of The Communicator) very helpful.

For one who is retired and living out of New York state, this news magazine is frequently the only way to remain informed. Thank you for the article.

KATHLEEN McCAHILL
North Ft. Myers, FL


Fans are where you find them
To the Editor:
I’m an activist with the AFT-Wisconsin in Madison. I’m a state employee and member of local 4848. I always read your magazine when I visit a friend, a retiree who gets it on the East Coast.

Can I subscribe to keep up with your inspiring activities?

BARBARA SMITH
Madison, WI

Editor’s note: If you would like to receive The Communicator, please e-mail your request to www.thecommunicator.org.

Letter To The Editor Mailbox


The Communicator Letters policy
We welcome letters to the editor about union issues and events relevant to PEF's diverse membership. All letters are subject to editing for space, fairness and good taste.

Please keep them brief (up to one page, double-spaced or a maximum of 250 words), and please include your name and phone number for verification.
Send letters to thecommunicator@pef.org:
The Communicator
Public Employees Federation
P.O. Box 12414
Albany, N.Y. 12212-2414

Email to Sherry Halbrook,  Editor or Darcy Wells, Editor-In Chief