Public option wrong reform
To the Editor:
Hardly anyone can deny health care needs reform. The only issue is how that
reform is achieved. A government takeover or a public option are not the
answer.
As government employees, every day we see incredible waste and policies that
create inefficiency and nonsense.
Right now, our membership enjoys what is probably the best coverage and
choice in the country, as do most government employees. We have incredible
choice as to plan and doctors.
PEF’s primary concern should be for members.
The most important benefits state employees cherish are job security and
medical and dental insurance. What will the union negotiate to make up for
this loss? Shouldn’t our dues pay for PEF to campaign for things that
benefit the members?
ROY TORRES
Westbury
Editor’s Note: PEF’s position on national health care reform is the
Single Payer plan, which means everyone would have the same benefits. That
position has been established repeatedly by the elected delegates to PEF’s
annual conventions, the highest policy-making body in PEF.
(See related article.)
Better health reform options
To The Editor:
As someone who retired with 31 years experience in health care
administration and more than 20 years in health care finance, I agree reform
is needed. However, currently proposed legislation is deficient in several
ways.
Malpractice tort reform is needed. The current system encourages the
expensive practice of “defensive medicine,” and inflates all medical costs.
We must recruit or train more primary care physicians. A shortage of primary
care physicians contributes to the excessive use of emergency rooms and also
encourages patients to go directly to specialists, who are more expensive.
We must expand the availability of clinics and urgent care centers, which
can do many of the things done in emergency rooms for less cost.
Finally, we must repeal the myriad laws, rules and regulations which
restrict comparison shopping for insurance coverage. Plenty of good choices
are out there, if people only had a chance to choose them.
HOWARD G. BAUMGARTNER
Troy
Offering free PTSD treatment
To the Editor:
Your article on “Supporting the Warrior” by Deborah Miles (September 2009)
explores the suffering of New Yorkers affected by the wars in the Middle
East, including the effects of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on
veterans.
PTSD is a treatable illness. At New York State Psychiatric Institute in New
York City, we are conducting a research treatment study, funded by the
National Institute of Mental Health, which offers individuals suffering from
PTSD one of three different kinds of psychotherapy for PTSD for 14 weeks at
no cost.
Individuals who do not respond to the study treatment are offered an
additional three months of treatment at no cost.
Veterans or their family members who may have PTSD are encouraged to call
Helena Rosenfeld at (212) 543-6747.
JOHN C. MARKOWITZ, MD
New York City

The Communicator
Letters policy
We welcome letters to the editor about union issues
and events relevant to PEF's diverse membership. All letters are subject to
editing for space, fairness and good taste.
Please keep them brief (up to one page, double-spaced or a maximum of 250
words), and please include your name and phone number for verification.
Send letters to
thecommunicator@pef.org:
The
Communicator
Public Employees Federation
P.O. Box 12414
Albany, N.Y. 12212-2414
Email to Sherry
Halbrook, Editor or Darcy Wells,
Editor-In Chief