By
Mary Caroline Powers
Senior correction counselors now have a major court
decision to add to their argument that they shouldn't be
conducting inmate disciplinary hearings.A state Supreme Court justice has
sided with PEF in an important out-of-title case
involving senior correction counselor Larry Woodward, who
works at Elmira Correctional Facility.
Woodward has been required to act as a hearing officer
conducting Tier III inmate disciplinary hearings since
1994 on a routine and regular basis.
Justice Stephen Ferradino of the Supreme Court, Albany
County, ruled in October that the state Department of
Correctional Services (DOCS) regulation that allowed
Woodward's superintendent to assign him to the hearings
was in conflict with state Civil Service Law.
It is also a direct violation of Article 17 of PEF's
contract with the state.
"This could have a precedential effect. The agency
now has been informed that the courts have ruled that
such assignment is illegal. Other correction counselors
can now object to performing this out-of-title work, and
we hope it will get to the point that the agency won't
assign counselors or other non-hearing officers to
disciplinary hearings," said PEF General Counsel
William Seamon.
After repeatedly being assigned to conduct Tier III
proceedings, Woodward requested that his name be taken
off the hearing officers list. His request was denied,
and an out-of-title grievance was filed in February 1997.
The grievance was denied by DOCS, and then submitted to
the Governor's Office of Employee Relations (GOER), where
it was again turned back in August 1997.
Having exhausted the grievance process under the PS&T
contract, in May the union filed an Article 78 proceeding
charging GOER with being "arbitrary and
capricious" in its denial of Woodward's grievance.
The court ruled in October.
"In his decision, Judge Ferradino made note of the
clear distinctions in Civil Service specifications for
hearing officers (grade 25) and senior correction
counselors (grade 22), and underscored the different
roles Woodward was forced to fill in terms of his
relationship with inmates," Seamon said. As a senior
correction counselor, Woodward operates in an advisory
capacity, Seamon said, while in the Tier III hearings, he
may be in an adversarial role.
"Judge Ferradino wrote in his decision that the two
bear no substantial similarity, concluding that for a
counselor to act as a hearing officer would be
'inappropriate,'" Seamon said.
Ferradino also noted that GOER had not alleged any
"temporary emergency" to justify Woodward's
assignment, and did not dispute that Woodward had
conducted hearings on "a long-term, routine
rotational basis."
While Ferradino ordered that Woodward be paid for the
out-of-title work he performed as a hearing officer, he
likely won't see any back pay for a while.
"Because DOCS relies on senior correction counselors
and other PS&T titles to conduct tier hearings, an
appeal by the state should be expected," Seamon
said.
Until the appeals process is exhausted, Seamon is
advising Woodward and other correction counselors that it
would be insubordinate to refuse to perform out-of-title
work if it is assigned.
"You must continue to do the work, then grieve it,
until this is settled," he said.
The Communicator Home Page
|
|