Agrees with
writer of tax-cut letter
To the Editor:
It was refreshing to read the editorial from
David Gallagher, regarding the federal tax cut.
I couldnt have worded it better myself.
Decisions made for my family are best made
in-house.
It will be money well spent.
Mark
Norton
Syracuse |
Deferred
comp plan has its advantages
To the Editor:
This letter is to respond to a September letter
to the editor that compares Roth IRAs to the New
York state Deferred Compensation Plan. The author
apparently prefers Roth IRAs to the plan because
of the investment, distribution and tax
characteristics they possess. While people will
no doubt decide for themselves, for the purposes
of comparison, it is important to consider a
number of facts that were not included in the
letter.
The plan offers 26 quality investment options,
along with additional services, at costs to
participants that are significantly lower than
those typically charged by providers of IRAs. The
authors opinion that a professionally
managed account would have benefited
participants performance during the recent
market downturn is debatable.
Two significant tax advantages of the plan that
were not mentioned by the author warrant mention
here. Unlike contributions to Roth IRAs,
contributions to the plan are made on a pre-tax
basis. Also, unlike distributions from IRAs,
distributions from the plan before the age of 59
1/2 are not subject to a 10 percent penalty tax.
No description of the plan would be complete
without mentioning the Economic Growth and Tax
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA). The
pension provisions included in EGTRRA, which
passed thanks to the efforts of PEF and others,
will provide participants in the plan with
unprecedented benefits, including increased
contribution limits and new flexibility in
distributions.
Julian
M. Regan,
Executive Director
NYS Deferred Compensation Plan |
Benefits
help appreciated
To the Editor:
I would like to thank PEF and especially the
efforts of health benefits specialist Lorraine
Simpkins and my local steward Richard Grebe on my
behalf.
I am a kidney-transplant recipient and recently
experienced problems with my employee health
insurance when my Medicare benefits terminated
three years after my transplant. The Empire Plan
refused to acknowledge its primary-insurer
responsibilities and declined payment for medical
services. The mix-up occurred when my regional
personnel administrator failed to notify the
Employee Benefits Division of Civil Service of my
health care change. Consequently, no one was
paying my medical bills.
After working through agency channels and getting
nowhere, I turned to PEF.
Grebe and Simpkins assessed the problem and went
to work with the Governors Office of
Employee Relations and Civil Service to rectify
the problem. After many months of correspondence
and telephone calls, my employee health benefits
have been restored.
Grebe and Simpkins did an outstanding job beyond
their normal duties and I am very much indebted
to them and PEF for representing me. They are
indeed a credit to PEF and should be commended
for their valuable service and assistance to
union members such as myself.
I am proud to be a member of PEF. Thank you.
James R.
Papero
Plattsburgh |